Right now lancer still seems to be better than destroying buildings.
Also I am not sure what the intention with LRM was? I imagine you wanted to make titan a lot less effective against mechs but I do not think it was even necessary, titan already struggles against other mechs due it being slowest mech in the game right after jug. Not to mention that new tit's LRM works so differently from other LRMs it is dubious to still call it that (look jug's SRM).
The 100 mm still has lower building dps than a simple artillery cannon (idk if it is due to raw damage, different damage type or slow-ass reload speed but considering its poor infantry damage I am guessing the damage type is anti mech).
Would it be possible to introduce new damagefactor that specifically works with 100mm and equals 1.0 against everything but buildings? Reverting the 100mm and just increasing building's weakness against it sounds like the best solution to me.
Right now lancer still seems to be better than destroying buildings. Also I am not sure what the intention with LRM was? I imagine you wanted to make titan a lot less effective against mechs but I do not think it was even necessary, titan already struggles against other mechs due it being slowest mech in the game right after jug. Not to mention that new tit's LRM works so differently from other LRMs it is dubious to still call it that (look jug's SRM). The 100 mm still has lower building dps than a simple artillery cannon (idk if it is due to raw damage, different damage type or slow-ass reload speed but considering its poor infantry damage I am guessing the damage type is anti mech).
Would it be possible to introduce new damagefactor that specifically works with 100mm and equals 1.0 against everything but buildings? Reverting the 100mm and just increasing building's weakness against it sounds like the best solution to me.