Allow Non-Admin Users to Create and Edit Buildings

[spaceraccoon]

Non-admin users should be able to create buildings and edit the buildings they've created.

• At the moment the database does not support it; the building model should include a creator property and the user model should include a buildings property. This requires a DB migration.
• Permissions at the /buildings/update route need to be modified
• Front-end changes to allow adding buildings

[spaceraccoon]

@duhaime As far as I can tell there is no one-to-many relationship expressed in the current user and building models. Does this look right?

[duhaime]

@spaceraccoon I'm not quite sure what you mean. The initial app requirements had a simple user model--only admins could create/edit buildings, and only superadmins could appoint admins. There was no notion of a user-building relationship beyond the simple rights model described above. Does this answer your question?

[spaceraccoon]

Yep that answers my question, thanks. I might have to run a database migration in this case as they want for non-admins to be able the create buildings and edit the buildings they have created, requiring some sort of relationship.

On Feb 3, 2018, at 11:40 PM, Douglas Duhaime notifications@github.com wrote:

@spaceraccoon I'm not quite sure what you mean. The initial app requirements had a simple user model--only admins could create/edit buildings, and only superadmins could appoint admins. There was no notion of a user-building relationship beyond the simple rights model described above. Does this answer your question?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[spaceraccoon]

DB models and backend support updated in #313

[duhaime]

@spaceraccoon Sounds good!