FAILURE: pyang -f tree yang/vendor/cisco/xe/16111/ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing.yang

[freedanzman]

ERRORS:

$ pwd /c/CODE/repos/cisco-product-apis/restconf/yang/vendor/cisco/xe/16111 $ pyang -f tree ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing.yang ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing.yang:104: error: node ietf-routing::routing-instance is not found ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing.yang:149: error: node ietf-routing::fib-route is not found ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing.yang:164: error: node ietf-routing::fib-route is not found ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing.yang:180: error: node ietf-routing::fib-route is not found

ATTEMPTED DIAGNOSIS:

ietf-routing.yang line 5:

prefix "rt";

ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing.yang lines 7-9:

import ietf-routing { prefix "rt"; }

ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing.yang lines 103-104:

augment "/rt:routing/rt:routing-instance/rt:routing-protocols/"

• "rt:routing-protocol/rt:static-routes" {

The error seems to be saying that from the augment statement above, it cannot find "rt:routing-instance" under the "rt:routing" part of the model/tree in ietf-routing.yang.

ietf-routing.yang lines 500-526:

container routing { description "Configuration parameters for the routing subsystem."; list routing-instance { key "name"; description "Configuration of a routing instance.";

And yet "list routing-instance" is right there on line 523, right under the parent routing container (typical).

So... yeah. No idea why this is broken. I checked the syntax to make sure nothing was missing or misplaced in terms of {}s or ;s and that all seems legitimate to me. No idea why it cannot find routing-instance in the hierarchy when it is clearly there.

Similar problem with fib-route on ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing.yang lines 149/164/180. I was able to find fib-route in ietf-routing.yang line 669.

I must not know enough. Please teach me YANG wizards.

Cheers.

[einarnn]

IIRC, this is a defect in pyang. If you try yanglint instead:

❯ /opt/git-repos/libyang/build/yanglint -f tree ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing.yang
module: ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing

  augment /rt:routing/rt:routing-instance/rt:routing-protocols/rt:routing-protocol/rt:static-routes:
    +--rw ipv4
       +--rw route* [destination-prefix]
          +--rw destination-prefix    inet:ipv4-prefix
          +--rw description?          string
          +--rw next-hop
             +---u rt:next-hop-content
  augment /rt:fib-route/rt:input/rt:destination-address:
    +--rw address?   inet:ipv4-address
  augment /rt:fib-route/rt:output/rt:route:
    +--rw destination-prefix?   inet:ipv4-prefix
  augment /rt:fib-route/rt:output/rt:route/rt:next-hop/rt:next-hop-options/rt:simple-next-hop:
    +--rw next-hop-address?   inet:ipv4-address

Unfortunately I cannot recall if a defect was raised against pyang.