Open gavanderhoorn opened 1 year ago
It might be nice to allow this rate to be configured, independently of the rates of the executors.
A comment I received on this: in_motion
is part of the RobotStatus
publications.
Reducing the update rate on robot_status
would also complicate tracking motion status at a high frequency.
For certain applications it's advantageous to have access to information about whether or not a robot is in_motion
with the minimum amount of a delay possible.
I'm not sure what a good way forward would be here.
We currently publish
RobotStatus
at the same rate asJointState
.That's unnecessary, and also different from how MotoROS1 did/does it.
High frequency publications come with drawbacks. They:
>
100 Hz this can become quite significant)With this in mind, combined with the fact the information carried by
RobotStatus
messages is largely static and/or changes (very) infrequently, we should reduce the publication frequency to something like 10 Hz as it was inmotoman_driver
.