Closed suntzu86 closed 10 years ago
Still quite a bit slower than originally, but that doesn't seem avoidable due to the expense of even low accuracy mvndst calls.
After @bulutcocuk pushed #381, we're down to:
moe.tests.views.rest.gp_next_points_test TestGpNextPointsViews.test_interface_returns_same_as_cpp ... ok in 1.56s
which is ok
Before this push: https://github.com/Yelp/MOE/pull/352, i.e., in 9345f69dcd094e2febf3c4688d27cbc8575f713d:
After, i.e., in c63f5c03e5763dae1f1a9d9551c2fb5c0ac24e29 performance varies widely but it's some 300x slower:
I'd guess that means somewhere in here we're doing full solves instead of very limited solves with the "TEST_" parameters. But I'm honestly not sure. Since the parameters are set in the test file, that might mean we're no longer parsing optimizer parameters correctly? Don't know.