Closed yx-xu closed 4 years ago
Hi,
Please see the readme for full descriptions, but generally you can define the peak file outputs with this option:
### FINAL OUTPUTS
merged_peaks_custombed: 204.01v02.IDR.out.0102merged.bed
merged_peaks_bed: 204.01v02.IDR.out.0102merged.custombed
For inputs to the pipeline, the actual fields are defined in the README, but if you're using the eCLIP analysis pipeline, let me attach the extensions that correspond to these inputs:
PCR-deduped sorted BAM file from your IP dataset (same one that you provide Clipper)
myRBP.IP.umi.r1.fq.genome-mappedSoSo.rmDupSo.bam
PCR-deduped sorted BAM file from your size-matched INPUT dataset
myRBP.INPUT.umi.r1.fq.genome-mappedSoSo.rmDupSo.bam
Clipper-called peak clusters (or input-normalized
myRBP.IP.umi.r1.fq.genome-mappedSoSo.rmDupSo.peakClusters.bed
Okay, Thanks for your reply! And after we normalize the peak with input, what peaks we think as enriched? I use the criteria p<0.05 and FC>=2, what criteria do you suggest? Thank you again!
The ENCODE integrated paper uses the following cutoffs of -log10(p) >= 3 and log2(fold) >= 3. This merge_peaks pipeline scripts has these values by default here.
HI! I used the cutoffs of -log10(p) >= 3 and log2(fold) >= 3, but there are only several peaks passed, so I relaxed the criterial. I don't know if it is feasible to do so. You helped me a lot! Thank you very much!
Hi! I have a question during i use merge_peaks to normalize peak called by CLIPper. There are several steps in example of merge_peaks, but which result do we need to do downstream analysis? Or, which peak file could be considered as confident result of a RBP binding sites? Looking forward for your reply! Thank you very much!