Deduplication needed for the final list

[Yer1k]

Hi all,

While tagging, as expected, I see duplicate WWTP candidates, since we did decide to include "part-of-WWTP" images into the "Yes" bucket, as well as combining different datasets.

Which means two things:

• our model correctly identifies them, given they have few differences. Cheer!
• we need to deduplicate after we have completed our verification list. As we discussed, we can do a 1-km-wise comparison of different WWTP locations. After that, we want to integrate location/lat-long info and other details into the dataset.

[5ukhy21]

Can you provide an example of where you saw this?

[Yer1k]

Can you provide an example of where you saw this?

For example,

• Different dataset, same WWTP (different names on the bottom)

In Kentucky

• Same dataset (must be OSM), same WWTP, may due to the legacy bounding box difference

In Delaware