Closed caleblucas closed 1 year ago
Thank you, @caleblucas , for taking your time review our paper. This is a great suggestion, which can help make our major contribution stand out more. I have revised the text, and you should be able to see the new added text from this link https://github.com/Yingjie4Science/SDGdetector/commit/3cbb5af904209692d3c80785c4350bea4c602572
Great, thanks @Yingjie4Science! Is there a way to reproduce the performance metrics provided in the paper/repo (e.g. pg 3 here https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EHUV6Jc3N4A-IshKU4dbxtIqlfj50mzi/view)? Code to reproduce/verify the metrics needs to be in the repo I believe.
Also, sdg_icon()
is handy! Nice idea.
@Yingjie4Science can you please add a citation to text2sdg
in the references section of the paper?
Hi @caleblucas, thanks again for the suggestions!
text2sdg
in other sections and I agree we need to add a citation to text2sdg
in the paragraph where we discussed the key differences between SDGdetector
and text2sdg
. See our revision here https://github.com/Yingjie4Science/SDGdetector/commit/1932a5303d1664baa779689ba9a2cc64cd46d48d@Yingjie4Science fantastic! thank you. can you please link the performance metric files in the readme (probably next to where the supplementary document is linked now?) and note somewhere in the paper that the data/code to replicate those results are available in the repo?
@caleblucas Yes! We have added related text in the repo's readme (https://github.com/Yingjie4Science/SDGdetector/commit/b87c4e5fe24b4eb3c077ac263bfbd22f18b3da1d) and in the paper (see https://github.com/Yingjie4Science/SDGdetector/commit/56cf11fbe3462fd879b0055c17b2f8892807ee9c)
We have also added more tests per another reviewer's suggestions, and the current test coverage is 93.45%. See https://github.com/Yingjie4Science/SDGdetector/commit/bfed791e877e82ceafb7bbe25b0ebfad95b11b2a
Great @Yingjie4Science! Thanks. I noticed the other reviewer's great suggestions and extending the test coverage was a great improvement.
@Yingjie4Science Very excited to review your alls paper at JoSS and hope all is well - seems like things are going great.
JoSS wants related packages to be briefly discussed and differentiated ("Do the authors describe how this software compares to other commonly-used packages?") - what about adding a blurb (I think these can even be footnotes) regarding text2sdg and mentioning the differences?