Closed gbarter closed 3 years ago
Dear Garrett,
Yes, HAMS can support the 0- and infinite-frequencies calculation (the part being commented out in the main program). I need to have some time to enable that. The functionality is not realized via infinite frequency input, but by modifying the Green function for the two special cases. I will let you know when this functionality is ready to use.
Best regards, Yingyi
Garrett Barter @.***> 于2021年7月1日周四 上午3:49写道:
Hi Yingyi,
Does HAMS support the 0-frequency and infinite-frequency response? Maybe the infinite frequency through some Wamit-style use of negative frequency input values?
Many thanks, Garrett
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/YingyiLiu/HAMS/issues/16, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJ2G3NB4I6ZRVUWF2MFQT23TVNRNPANCNFSM47S5K3UQ .
Thank you for the quick response. Let me know when you get around to making these changes. In the meantime, we will use a very large finite frequency to approximate the infinite frequency response.
Dear Garrett,
I have enabled the functionality for the two frequency limits in the latest updates. I removed the commented-out section and coded this part in a much simpler way.
Please note that for the time being, while the functionality works perfectly well for the infinite-depth condition, it should only be used as an approximation for the exact values (typically having a relative error of up to 20~30% in the added mass) in the finite-depth conditions (especially when the water depth is very shallow in comparison to the draught of the floating body), I will study the precise way of evaluating the limits in finite-depth conditions. I will let you know when this improvement is ready.
Best regards, Yingyi
Garrett Barter @.***> 于2021年7月1日周四 下午8:50写道:
I see in the commented out section in HAMS_Prog running very small https://github.com/YingyiLiu/HAMS/blob/master/SourceCode/HAMS_Prog.f90#L221 and negative https://github.com/YingyiLiu/HAMS/blob/master/SourceCode/HAMS_Prog.f90#L247 frequency values. If it helps, HAMS does seem to run fine and give reasonable answers if given a frequency of 0.0.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/YingyiLiu/HAMS/issues/16#issuecomment-872178767, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJ2G3NAL65NNM445US3EUN3TVRI7BANCNFSM47S5K3UQ .
Things are working great- thank you!
Might want to update the documentation regarding the new line in the Control file, but this Issue has definitely been addressed.
Thanks, the documentation has been updated.
Garrett Barter @.***> 于2021年7月3日周六 上午1:14写道:
Things are working great- thank you!
Might want to update the documentation regarding the new line in the Control file, but this Issue has definitely been addressed.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/YingyiLiu/HAMS/issues/16#issuecomment-873110412, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJ2G3NERHBFDCI2X3KJZMRLTVXQXJANCNFSM47S5K3UQ .
Hi Yingyi,
Does HAMS support the 0-frequency and infinite-frequency response? Maybe the infinite frequency through some Wamit-style use of negative frequency input values?
Many thanks, Garrett