Open jamiegau opened 3 years ago
Thanks for the note @jamiegau, I'll let other comment on the importance of Markers.
Just wanted to add that when the idea of custom check profiles is implemented (ie. check once; validate against multiple profiles of DCP), we can can hopefully support that and let users choose what weight they want to put on Markers. If we provide a RDD52 profile, then it should probably throw a plain error if that's something specified.
Heads up. Credit markers were discussed at ISDCF. (Unfortunately I was not able to attend, the 3am start time for me is just too much)
But in the notes:
Which leads me to ask, what stance should we take on Credit Markers. I personally think them super important and would prefer to see a error/warning that makes it very clear they should be present in say any feature/short type content that you would expect them.
But really, you cannot FAIL content is they are not present.
This is a big issue as I see more reliance on them in the future for automation. And like a lot of automation, there will eventually be relied upon to much. As such, software such as clairmeta really needs to bring attention to them.
Something to think about.
James