FIXED: Warning: in_array() expects parameter 2 to be array, boolean given in .../plugins/wordpress-seo/admin/class-yoast-plugin-conflict.php on line 269

[fnorte]

• [X] I've read and understood the contribution guidelines.
• [X] I've searched for any related issues and avoided creating a duplicate issue.

Please give us a description of what happened.

In my development enviroment in a multisite installation, one of the sites report this warning: Warning: in_array() expects parameter 2 to be array, boolean given in (...)/plugins/wordpress-seo/admin/class-yoast-plugin-conflict.php on line 269

Following the code I realized that the object in line #74, is retrive a boll(false) instead an array , necessary in the line that occured the Warning : $this->all_active_plugins = get_option( 'active_plugins' );

the unknow reason, that I need personally investigate is why this wordpress base function "get_option", that supposed to list the active plugins is empty.

Please describe what you expected to happen and why.

Since the possibility of this false response in that funcion, for safety I decided to change the bollean false response to put this type inside an array to avoid this warning, when this object is used in a necessary array type variable, change this line to this: $this->all_active_plugins = (array) get_option( 'active_plugins', array() );

How can we reproduce this behavior?

1. I don't know yeat, because I need to understand why the active plugins list is returned false

Technical info

• If relevant, which editor is affected (or editors):
• [ ] Classic Editor
• [X] Gutenberg
• [ ] Classic Editor plugin

• Which browser is affected (or browsers):
• [X] Chrome
• [ ] Firefox
• [ ] Safari
• [ ] Other

Used versions

• WordPress version: 5.3.2 (pt_br)
• Yoast SEO version: 13.0
• Gutenberg plugin version:
• Classic Editor plugin version:
• Relevant plugins in case of a bug:
• Tested with theme: Sparkling (child modificaation) by Colorlib.com

[Djennez]

Hi @fnorte and thanks for the report. You're right, we should check for an array here. I'll mark this as a valid bug report, though not one with high priority.