Describe the bug
Currently a chain of comments like _LULIM_ (LULIC) LULAR will be written as such which when sprinkled into the rest of a grade may make "reading the story" of the landing difficult.
Expected behavior
Using the above example, this could be written simply as LULIM-AR.
Similarly LURX LURIM LURIC LURAR could be written as LURAW
Additional Info
When evaluating the severity of the grades perhaps a point system could be assigned where a minor deviation ( (LURX) ) is worth 1 point, a normal deviation is worth 2 points (LURX), and a major deviation is worth 3 points (_LURX_). The points for each phase that get added to the merged comment are averaged and the merged comment made minor if the average is between 1 and 1.5, normal if between 1.5 and 2.5, and major if 2.5 to 3.
Describe the bug Currently a chain of comments like
_LULIM_ (LULIC) LULAR
will be written as such which when sprinkled into the rest of a grade may make "reading the story" of the landing difficult.Expected behavior Using the above example, this could be written simply as
LULIM-AR
. SimilarlyLURX LURIM LURIC LURAR
could be written asLURAW
Additional Info When evaluating the severity of the grades perhaps a point system could be assigned where a minor deviation (
(LURX)
) is worth 1 point, a normal deviation is worth 2 points (LURX
), and a major deviation is worth 3 points (_LURX_
). The points for each phase that get added to the merged comment are averaged and the merged comment made minor if the average is between 1 and 1.5, normal if between 1.5 and 2.5, and major if 2.5 to 3.e.g.
(LURX)
1ptLURIM
2pts_LURIC_
3pts = 5pts/3 = 2 Normal.But there would need to also be a bias towards IC and AR calls since these are inherently less safe deviations.