Is js-js-ctypes repo the v2 that you mentioned above.
I read that bsmedberg wanted to disallow js-ctypes, so I thought if js-ctypes-v2 came around he might allow it.
So I started looking how to help out. As I think js-ctypes benefits (below) outweigh the cons (speed, memory, manual type defs). Also I think js-ctypes aligns with the intent that led to WebExtensions.
Extremely newbie friendly.
And that's one of the driving factors of moving to WebExtensions. It allows web developers to program in a familiar environment (their text editor)
Copy paste friendly
Getting those expensive tools, like a mac in order to use xcode. Or certain parts of visual studio
Higher learning curve, as need to compile binaries with etc etc flags
Create platform dependent stuff, in a platform independent way - perfect for addons as they seek to enhance behavior at native app levels
Hi Yoric, Is js-ctypes v2 you mentioned in this topic - https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/mozilla.dev.extensions/B3H3j6FRVms/k5W7qLwqBwAJ
Is js-js-ctypes repo the v2 that you mentioned above.
I read that bsmedberg wanted to disallow js-ctypes, so I thought if js-ctypes-v2 came around he might allow it. So I started looking how to help out. As I think js-ctypes benefits (below) outweigh the cons (speed, memory, manual type defs). Also I think js-ctypes aligns with the intent that led to WebExtensions.