Closed Marius1311 closed 10 months ago
Hi @Marius1311 ,
Thanks for posting this question. I'd be happy to set up a VC to discuss this, but perhaps we can try to arrive at a conclusion here for posterity.
Can you specify if you see non-monotonic behavior with changing lca_cutoff
? If this is the case, I would expect there to be a bug that you've encountered.
Otherwise, it's possible you would see large jumps in the number of subproblems for decreasing lca_cutoff
, depending on the nuances of the the dataset. For example, there might be a threshold effect where most lineages converge before a certain point (let's say t0
); thus, if you were to use an lca_cutoff < t0
you could possibly see a massive jump in the number of subploblems than if you were to use an lca_cutoff > t0
.
Personally, I prefer the use of the lca_cutoff
parameter as it more faithfully represents the difficulty of a subproblem, and I normally use an lca_cutoff
between 12 and 20.
I hope this is helpful, and please let me know if you have further questions.
Closing this due to inactivity; please feel free to re-open if you have any other questions. And hope your analysis is going well!
HI @mattjones315, I'm struggling a bit with thing hyperparameters for the hybrid solver in Cassiopeia and I was wondering whether you would have time at some point to discuss this via VC. For example, I've found on my data that small changes to
lca_cutoff
can cause very large differences to the number of subproblems being solved, and I'm not sure how to interpret this. Thanks in advance!