Hello, I am using this project to predict the docking pose of cyclic peptides with proteins. I am using several examples from the original paper, such as 1SFI and 3AV9. The input format is in the form of a CSV file, and the sequence is formatted as described in the tutorial, with a colon separating the protein and cyclic peptide parts,such as “1SFI,IVGGYTCGANTVPYQVSLNXXSGYHFCGGSLINSQWVVSAAHCYKSGIQVRLXGEDNINVVEGNEQFISASKSIVHPSYNSNTLNNDIMLIKLKSAASLNSRVASISLPTXSCASXAGTQCLISGWGNTKSSGTSYPDVLKCLKAPILSDSSCKSAYPGQITSNMFCAGYLEGGKDSCQGDSGGPVVCSGKXXXXLQGIVSWGSXGCAQKNKPGVYTKVCNYVSWIKQTIASN:GRCTKSIPPICFPD”. However, I have noticed that the predicted peptides in the results are not forming cyclic peptides, but rather linear peptides. Thank you for any replies.
Hello, I am using this project to predict the docking pose of cyclic peptides with proteins. I am using several examples from the original paper, such as 1SFI and 3AV9. The input format is in the form of a CSV file, and the sequence is formatted as described in the tutorial, with a colon separating the protein and cyclic peptide parts,such as “1SFI,IVGGYTCGANTVPYQVSLNXXSGYHFCGGSLINSQWVVSAAHCYKSGIQVRLXGEDNINVVEGNEQFISASKSIVHPSYNSNTLNNDIMLIKLKSAASLNSRVASISLPTXSCASXAGTQCLISGWGNTKSSGTSYPDVLKCLKAPILSDSSCKSAYPGQITSNMFCAGYLEGGKDSCQGDSGGPVVCSGKXXXXLQGIVSWGSXGCAQKNKPGVYTKVCNYVSWIKQTIASN:GRCTKSIPPICFPD”. However, I have noticed that the predicted peptides in the results are not forming cyclic peptides, but rather linear peptides. Thank you for any replies.