Closed Polymathronic closed 8 years ago
http://linkedeconomy.org/ontology#Studies is actually a concept of concept scheme Kinds just like http://purl.org/procurement/public-contracts-kinds#Supplies and that's why we did it that way.
Why is important to change it?
My opinion is that the ontology
namespace should remain reserved for the TBox (that would also be in line with our approach so far). The two concepts are skos:Concept
individuals (ABox), so I believe they belong in the resource
namespace, along with all other individuals. Right now, they are the only skos:Concepts
using the elod
prefix.
It's ok now.
Please check the following queries,
select distinct * from http://yourdatastories.eu/NSRF/Diavgeia where {http://linkedeconomy.org/resource/Kind/Studies ?p ?o}
select distinct * from http://yourdatastories.eu/NSRF/Diavgeia where {http://linkedeconomy.org/resource/ProcedureType/LowValue ?p ?o}
http://linkedeconomy.org/ontology#LowValue
andhttp://linkedeconomy.org/ontology#Studies
use the TBox (elod
) prefix instead of thehttp://linkedeconomy.org/resource/
one.