search

YuSoonZ / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

DG Use of period notation #9

Open YuSoonZ opened 1 month ago

YuSoonZ commented 1 month ago

image.png

Under the alternative test case section, where the period notations are after the block of codes, there is one: schedule 1 s/23-12-2024T16:00 e/23-12-2024T17:00 mr/Prefers to meet at home/zoom

which is inconsistent as the period is within the block

nus-pe-bot commented 1 month ago

Team's Response

Thank you for the bug report.

Our team acknowledges your sharp eyes for managing to point out this bug. However, we have decided to put this as NotInScope as this grammatical error does not hinder the reader.

Screenshot 2024-04-21 at 20.13.00.png

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.NotInScope]

Reason for disagreement: I do not agree with this as the period here is within the command example, of which I assume one should be able to copy and paste into the UI.

As opposed to my other period documentation find, this is within the command which I believe could and should be within the scope of Documentation Bug, unless it is given that you are intending to add a period within the meeting note, which in this case, is ambiguous.