Open jigaoxiang opened 2 years ago
This is strange. Would you check the resulting files? How are the p95 and p99 thresholds described in them?
This is strange. Would you check the resulting files? How are the p95 and p99 thresholds described in them? Dear doctor:
Thank you for your reply! I checked the resulting files. there are no problems with the p95 and p99. And then, I tried our own data using qtl-seq tool, the smooth lines appeared surprisingly! So, I did not pay more time in the test data! Thank you again for this useful tool!
Best wish!, Gaoxiang Ji
I'm facing the same issue, In the image the p95 and p99 and mean markings are missing. Could you please look into the attached files?
.
I am also facing the same issue.
Hi, I can see both p95 and p99 lines, which are green and yellow, respectively. So, it seems to be working nicely for me. Sometimes, the lines are broken because there are no mutations on the locus and the program can not calculate sliding window. How about the peak in LG04?
Best regards, Yu
Dear doctor: Thanks for your outstanding for this QTL-seq tool. But some question appear when I use the qtlseq software. When I use the test data to perform below code:
And then, there are not warring and error happing, like this
However, When I check the figure in 40_qtlseq file, there are no smooth lines in "bulk1_SNPindex.png,bulk2_SNPindex.png and delta_SNPindex.png", as the example follow show:
![delta_SNPindex (2)](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/65279501/148882172-67d6e402-94ca-4a9f-9440-a8d4a27863a1.png)
Could you give some advice for that? Thanks again for your help!
Best regards, Gaoxiang Ji