search

YungSang / fedora-atomic-packer

Fedora Atomic Packer for Vagrant Box
10 stars 7 forks source link

make fail due sudoers issues #7

Closed kikitux closed 9 years ago

kikitux commented 9 years ago

For some reason my make run fail

any hint?

https://gist.github.com/kikitux/d37b67c6a8dd1a76656e

YungSang commented 9 years ago

Are you useing Downloading or copying: file:///Volumes/hd1/Dropbox/work/packer-vagrant/fedora-atomic-packer/boot.iso instead of OVF? I guess that is a problem.

kikitux commented 9 years ago

deleted and running again..

I am running a copy of the project on github as is.. no changes

will report back soon

z2-3:fedora-atomic-packer kikitux$ rm boot.iso

z2-3:fedora-atomic-packer kikitux$ make | tee make.log

curl -LO http://rpm-ostree.cloud.fedoraproject.org/project-atomic/install/rawhide/20140708.0/boot.iso

% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current

                             Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left

Speed

25 750M 25 193M 0 0 22.9M 0 0:00:32 0:00:08 0:00:24 26.2M

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 5:42 PM, YungSang notifications@github.com wrote:

Are you useing Downloading or copying: file:///Volumes/hd1/Dropbox/work/packer-vagrant/fedora-atomic-packer/boot.iso instead of OVF? I guess that is a problem.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/YungSang/fedora-atomic-packer/issues/7#issuecomment-59639167 .

YungSang commented 9 years ago

Oh are you trying to build from scratch instal of upgrade?

kikitux commented 9 years ago

from scratch install, for some reason is not working for me.

did a new git clone, failed.

deleted the boot.iso and i am trying again..

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 5:45 PM, YungSang notifications@github.com wrote:

Oh are you trying to build from scratch instal of upgrade?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/YungSang/fedora-atomic-packer/issues/7#issuecomment-59639230 .

YungSang commented 9 years ago

Strange... Do you see the boot command in a VirtualBox GUI window?

kikitux commented 9 years ago

the machine boots install. run the commands,, with those warnings.. reboot i see the gui… it fail to shutdown.

gui is left running, i can login as vagrant/vagrant but sudo fail with same warning..

perhaps once the box is created something did change on atomic repo ???

On 19/10/2014, at 5:50 pm, YungSang notifications@github.com wrote:

Strange... Do you see the boot command in a VirtualBox GUI window?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

YungSang commented 9 years ago

i see the gui… it fail to shutdown.

This is a problem. After installation is complete, the boot config will set sudo setting. see http/atomic-ks.cfg

YungSang commented 9 years ago

I experience a sudo problem as well in the latest installation. Umm...

kikitux commented 9 years ago

ithink something changed upstream

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 6:06 PM, YungSang notifications@github.com wrote:

I experience a sudo problem as well in the latest installation. Umm...

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/YungSang/fedora-atomic-packer/issues/7#issuecomment-59639525 .

YungSang commented 9 years ago

Yup.

Anyway, I have created the upgraded box and tested it. It is over 100 MB bigger than the original box...

kikitux commented 9 years ago

any faster than pulling all from internet?

YungSang commented 9 years ago

Yes, it's much faster. Thank you so much for your idea.

When the sudo problem is fixed, I will release it.

kikitux commented 9 years ago

can you push to a dev branch?

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 7:04 PM, YungSang notifications@github.com wrote:

Yes, it's much faster. Thank you so much for your idea.

When the sudo problem is fixed, I will release it.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/YungSang/fedora-atomic-packer/issues/7#issuecomment-59640530 .

YungSang commented 9 years ago

https://github.com/YungSang/fedora-atomic-packer/tree/upgrade

kikitux commented 9 years ago

ok, seems i found the issue.. there is a hidden ^M character in http/atomic-ks.cfg

on the line cat << EOF > /etc/sudoers.d/vagrant^M

did you edit on windows? I am on OSX.

so the file gets created like that on the linux vm

I did login as root/vagrant did an ls and saw the issue.

YungSang commented 9 years ago

Oh really? I'm on OSX. I will check it.

kikitux commented 9 years ago

yeah, got pass that part immediately :+1: :smile:

YungSang commented 9 years ago

I don't see any hidden character in it...

kikitux commented 9 years ago

i did dos2unix and rertry and work.. the base box build finally

command i run: dos2unix http/atomic-ks.cfg

after that.. ==> Builds finished. The artifacts of successful builds are: --> virtualbox: VM files in directory: output-virtualbox --> virtualbox: 'virtualbox' provider box: ../fedora-atomic-virtualbox.box z2-3:fedora-atomic-packer kikitux$

YungSang commented 9 years ago

Umm.. It is not a dos format on my local OSX.

YungSang commented 9 years ago

BTW, how long does it take to build it from scratch on your side?

YungSang commented 9 years ago

In my case, systemd-hostnamed in the latest one has something wrong. sudo hostnamectl set-hostname something.domain.name fails.

kikitux commented 9 years ago

i am running it again. did make clean, now I am running as

time make | tee make.log

so will capture time and will check logs.. i didn't notice some commands fail.

will check logs once it finish

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 8:36 PM, YungSang notifications@github.com wrote:

In my case, systemd-hostnamed in the latest one has something wrong. sudo hostnamectl set-hostname something.domain.name fails.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/YungSang/fedora-atomic-packer/issues/7#issuecomment-59642097 .

YungSang commented 9 years ago

@kikitux Thank you so much for your help.

kikitux commented 9 years ago

all good.. I did really like the way you used make here to build the system, and how you have make test.

I can see the value..

I have a lot of machines that I build, and reuse, and I am using shell scripts at the moment, but make is way more cooler and better.. will try to see what I can get

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 8:41 PM, YungSang notifications@github.com wrote:

@kikitux https://github.com/kikitux Thank you so much for your help.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/YungSang/fedora-atomic-packer/issues/7#issuecomment-59642202 .

YungSang commented 9 years ago

Because I don't have a good network here, so it is too slow to build it... over 2 hours...

YungSang commented 9 years ago

Thanks a lot.

My wifi connection has something wrong currently. I will check it again later.

kikitux commented 9 years ago

Time, this is a mac mini in usa.

real 14m26.198s

user 0m35.223s

sys 0m10.166s

Did update the gist with the outputs of make upo and make test

https://gist.github.com/kikitux/d37b67c6a8dd1a76656e

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 8:43 PM, alvaro miranda kikitux@gmail.com wrote:

as for network, same here.. I am in New Zealand.. pretty bad international internet.

But I do have a mac mini hosted on macminivault with a very fast pipe, so I ssh there and use that machine to build my boxes.

On 19/10/2014, at 8:43 pm, YungSang notifications@github.com wrote:

Because I don't have a good network here, so it is too slow to build it... over 2 hours...

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/YungSang/fedora-atomic-packer/issues/7#issuecomment-59642253 .

YungSang commented 9 years ago

That log looks good. Thanks again.