Closed anmol26s closed 6 years ago
My backup is about 50Go. If it's a directory, Archivist will split it in small parts (~ 500Mo) and send them. If you have a disconnection during the copy, the next execution of Archivist will ending the job and remove the incomplete part. But, in no case you can expect a resume of your copy with rsync.
So, I think Archivist can be a solution. At least, I can say in my case, it works fine. Even with 50Go of datas.
My real problem is frequent disconnections. The backup from Archivist are working great for local storage. But I want a solution which can resume from where the internet got disconnection. I was thinking of torrents but this is not suited as they are not point to point and tracker could give away identity.
Did you check other methods than rsync and torrent ? Borg maybe ? Archivist is able to use another sender if you build a simple script to use a other protocol than rsync.
Borg maybe ? Borg looks good and there are lot of example scripts to automate backup. I will try it and later try to integrate it in Archivist. Thanks
Hi, Is Archivist good solution when backing up file is near about 25Gb through ssh_rsync and there are frequent disconnects?