Closed M5oul closed 7 years ago
It's good. But it's better to add an issue for Level 4=1 + add the URL of the issue in the 'check_process' file.
Ok, I will do that.
For the maintainer, perhaps it's better to have the name of the original maintainer of the package somewhere in the manifest or at least in comment (#).
For the original contributor, his contact is on git commits. For me it's enough.
We could create a file containing Contributors. I won't do it as git commits
say enough about work history of the repository.
Hum, the level 6 is reached only because yunohost return 0 even if the backup and restore are clearly failed ! And with a blank upgrade script, I should say that this app is only reaching the level 2...
Also, for official integration, some things are missing.
If you need some help, don't hesitate :)
Any review on this one? @frju365 ok for you now?
After reviewing it, I think @maniackcrudelis said it all. Moreover as a newer official app, it would be much better (expected?) to comply with the latest template (pending PRs on example_ynh). I understand these reviews are a bit harsh to read so feel free to raise your voice if needed :-)
Any approval for this MR? It only updates the package. For official integration, we will see later. Let's use #10 for that.
I just read the code, but I have already do a check earlier. So, ok for me for an upgrade.
firewall allow
.The app should go level 6 and could pretend official integration.