Closed maikherbig closed 7 years ago
Thanks for the pull request. The checks fail. I think it is because of the new argument model
which should be a keyword argument. Instead of the possible values "0" and "1", I would prefer "linear" and "generalized" or some such kind.
very goof idea. I changed it to 'glmm' and 'lmm'
The tests still fail... Please make sure to set 'lmm' as default
I have added 'lmm' as default argument, but the tests still fail. On my machine this script runs coorectly and without any error. Paul, do you have an idea what could be the problem?
It's a coveralls issue. The tests pass.
Hi, what is the status of this one? there seems to be no artifacts in this release
There are no artifacts, because Maiks branch is not allowed to submit to coveralls (I will fix this in the future). Either way, you would not benefit from a build, because the user interface needs to be updated (by me) to allow generalized lmm.
I am merging this into a separate branch for testing.
I am not merging into develop yet. Further discussions in issue #126.
I have added the variable "model" to the function linmixmod, which allows to perfom either a linear mixed model (model=0) or a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with a log-link function (model=1). GLMM might be better suited for skewed distributions like deformation. The user should be able to decide which model should be applied. Therefore I suggest a dropdown menu for LMM and GLMM