Closed phidahl closed 7 years ago
Instead of a checkbox, would it be ok if we created new data columns for this purpose ("FL-1 maximum, cross-talk-corrected [a.u.]")? Do you need this for the raw trace data as well?
new data columns would be even better. Nope, the trace data shall be unaffected. (for now)
Am 26.10.2017 um 12:41 schrieb Paul Müller notifications@github.com:
Instead of a checkbox, would it be ok if we created new data columns for this purpose ("FL-1 maximum, cross-talk-corrected [a.u.]")? Do you need this for the raw trace data as well?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ZELLMECHANIK-DRESDEN/ShapeOut/issues/185#issuecomment-339625642, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMPYzPWfJoOTmHjnht7LNa11lQ185-2-ks5swGHegaJpZM4QHUkc.
This is implemented in ShapeOut 0.8.1.dev21. Please test: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/paulmueller/ShapeOut/build/job/hb3l29qq79d8pu64/artifacts
I tested it and it seems to work. Thank you
For multichannel fluorescence measurements we need a way to compensate the fluorescence max. values.
Compensations means to take account for channel crosstalk by subtraction of an adjustable fraction of other channels from the values of one channel.
The corrections factors can be expressed by a (NxN) matrix A
fl1_max' = fl1_max - A_12 fl2_max - A_13 fl3_max fl2_max' = fl2_max - A_21 fl1_max - A_23 fl3_max fl3_max' = fl3_max - A_31 fl1_max - A_32 fl2_max
It would need a some edit fields to adjust the values of A_xy and a checkbox to switch compensation on/off.