Open jacob-mannhardt opened 1 year ago
I like this idea a lot! This could also be nice e.g. to groupby technology types in the Gui later on. What is your opinion @johburger?
It does make sense to me if you can really flexibly specify the groups. And what about carriers? Should we also introduce an optional type for them?
What do we do about those that we don't label? I wouldn't want to force the user to categorize every technology
I would give an empty label to everything that is not labeled. So that it is also backwards compatible to all datasets where no labels are specified at all.
Sounds good.
I would say that is a future task then, though, once we have the front end running.
I don't see the value in the optimization framework itself, do you?
Should we add an attribute that classifies a technology as a specific type of technology ("renewable", "conventional", ...)
Prompted by @gapaolo