Open psiotwo opened 1 year ago
This will be fixed in the next release
ERROR duplicate_label larva rdfs:label larva
ERROR duplicate_label larva rdfs:label larva
ERROR duplicate_label juvenile rdfs:label juvenile
ERROR duplicate_label juvenile rdfs:label juvenile
ERROR duplicate_label adult rdfs:label adult
ERROR duplicate_label adult rdfs:label adult
Still some duplicate labels:
@cerivs if you want to really get rid of these, you need to rename the obsolete
classes as obsolete
.
For example, larva
should be labelled obsolete larva
to avoid name conflicts.
@matentzn Is his is a new change to policy about naming classes? These were not previously a problem.
No, these were always a in OBO principles, see https://obofoundry.org/principles/fp-012-naming-conventions.html: having to classes with the same name. There is no 100% rule on how to deal with obsolete class names - some people delete the labels, other just prepend the prefix "obsolete", like in "obsolete larva" to indicate to users that the term is, indeed, obsolete.
Two pairs of OWL classes share the same definition.
First pair: ZFA:0000807 ZFA:0000927
Second pair: ZFA:0000944 ZFA:0005112