Open ZHANGTIANYAO1 opened 5 months ago
First, the current behavior is not incorrect --- the highlight part is indeed erroneous.
Second, we argue that your proposal would count to a feature suggestion. The cost of implementation of the feature is high --- because the highlighting is done by selection, and in order to implement your feature, either multi-cursor selection or a different mechanism of highlighting (styling) would be needed.
Related: #962 .
Team chose [response.NotInScope
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Description: Only one erroneous part can be highlighted.
Steps to reproduce:
edit 1 e/321312 c/CS1111111
.Expected behavior: UG said When a command contains an error, the program will try to detect the part of the command thatcauses the error, and selects it in the command box. So I assume it should be able to highlight more than one erroneous parts. Both
321312
andCS1111111
should be highlighted.Screenshots: