I've been working with the zk-garage PLONK implementation and I am interested in making it compatible with the snarkjs proof format. This would greatly enhance interoperability with other tools and platforms that utilize snarkjs.
Details:
zk-garage Proof Structure:
The zk-garage proof contains commitments to witness polynomials, permutation polynomials, lookup polynomials, and quotient polynomials.
Additionally, it contains batch opening proofs and evaluations.
snarkjs Proof Structure:
The snarkjs proof, as per my understanding, consists of an evaluation of polynomials at a random point, along with a series of elliptic curve points that act as commitments to those polynomials.
Challenges:
The two proof formats have distinct structures and might encode the circuit's information differently.
The elliptic curve representations may differ.
Request:
I would appreciate guidance or a potential enhancement to bridge the compatibility gap between these two formats. This could be in the form of:
A converter tool or function.
Documentation detailing the steps to convert between the two formats manually.
Additional Context:
Understanding the compatibility and potentially achieving it would be beneficial for developers like myself looking to leverage both tools in our zero-knowledge proof systems.
Thank you for the great work and looking forward to any insights or updates on this matter!
Description:
I've been working with the zk-garage PLONK implementation and I am interested in making it compatible with the
snarkjs
proof format. This would greatly enhance interoperability with other tools and platforms that utilizesnarkjs
.Details:
zk-garage Proof Structure:
snarkjs Proof Structure:
snarkjs
proof, as per my understanding, consists of an evaluation of polynomials at a random point, along with a series of elliptic curve points that act as commitments to those polynomials.Challenges:
Request:
I would appreciate guidance or a potential enhancement to bridge the compatibility gap between these two formats. This could be in the form of:
Additional Context:
Understanding the compatibility and potentially achieving it would be beneficial for developers like myself looking to leverage both tools in our zero-knowledge proof systems.
Thank you for the great work and looking forward to any insights or updates on this matter!