Closed davidnevadoc closed 2 years ago
This is addressed in #45.
You are right! I will add the changes I had in mind in the PR and will close this issue when it is merged.
I have a push that I'm waiting on since I lost push permissions, then you can see if my fixes addressed this issue. I just moved the PR instead.
There are some changes that could be made in order to improve the code of
linearisation_poly.rs
in terms of readability:a
,b
,c
,f_1
, etc.)