search

Zebra003 / uwish

uWish
0 stars 0 forks source link

Make repository private #1

Open pbjorklund opened 11 years ago

pbjorklund commented 11 years ago

Might not want to share this with the world?

Zebra003 commented 11 years ago

You think? I of course don't mind paying to do so... But I am curious as to why you think we need to?

//Jeff

On 11 feb 2013, at 15:10, Patrik Björklund notifications@github.com wrote:

Might not want to share this with the world?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub..

pbjorklund commented 11 years ago

All depends on where the money comes from I guess. Although with 1-2 devs it would be possible to just host the repo on a private server (I have one that we can use) instead of github.

Github is best for collaboration, so if the point is to get other people involved and make money from everything but the code then I guess a public github repo is the way to go.

pbjorklund commented 11 years ago

But then the repo needs atleast a readme that specifies what license it's released under. From what I have learnt code without a license get's "default" licenses applied according to the country that the user that pulled the code from lives in. (Or something like that, all I know is that licensing software is really complicated)

:ship:

Zebra003 commented 11 years ago

Well, I have an account I use for paying for stuff related to uWish, which has some considerable savings in it... But, of course I don't throw away money I don't have to.

I think collaboration is unlikely at this point.

What do you think we should do? And is it ok to leave it as is until Sunday? Or do we require more immediate action?

//Jeff

On 11 feb 2013, at 15:33, Patrik Björklund notifications@github.com wrote:

But then the repo needs atleast a readme that specifies what license it's released under. From what I have learnt code without a license get's "default" licenses applied according to the country that the user that pulled the code from lives in. (Or something like that, all I know is that licensing software is really complicated)

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub..

pbjorklund commented 11 years ago

Nah, it wouldn't really be to bad if someone "stole" the code before Sunday.

I have a server up and running that host the git repo for my company website, adding another repo will cost me nothing.

Mvh Patrik Björklund

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Zebra003 notifications@github.com wrote:

Well, I have an account I use for paying for stuff related to uWish, which has some considerable savings in it... But, of course I don't throw away money I don't have to.

I think collaboration is unlikely at this point.

What do you think we should do? And is it ok to leave it as is until Sunday? Or do we require more immediate action?

//Jeff

On 11 feb 2013, at 15:33, Patrik Björklund notifications@github.com wrote:

But then the repo needs atleast a readme that specifies what license it's released under. From what I have learnt code without a license get's "default" licenses applied according to the country that the user that pulled the code from lives in. (Or something like that, all I know is that licensing software is really complicated)

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub..

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/Zebra003/uwish/issues/1#issuecomment-13383716..

Zebra003 commented 11 years ago

Cool, we fix it on Sunday then.

//Jeff

On 11 feb 2013, at 16:06, Patrik Björklund notifications@github.com wrote:

Nah, it wouldn't really be to bad if someone "stole" the code before Sunday.

I have a server up and running that host the git repo for my company website, adding another repo will cost me nothing.

Mvh Patrik Björklund

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Zebra003 notifications@github.com wrote:

Well, I have an account I use for paying for stuff related to uWish, which has some considerable savings in it... But, of course I don't throw away money I don't have to.

I think collaboration is unlikely at this point.

What do you think we should do? And is it ok to leave it as is until Sunday? Or do we require more immediate action?

//Jeff

On 11 feb 2013, at 15:33, Patrik Björklund notifications@github.com wrote:

But then the repo needs atleast a readme that specifies what license it's released under. From what I have learnt code without a license get's "default" licenses applied according to the country that the user that pulled the code from lives in. (Or something like that, all I know is that licensing software is really complicated)

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub..

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/Zebra003/uwish/issues/1#issuecomment-13383716..

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub..