Open nkemnitz opened 1 year ago
@nkemnitz do you have an example spec to reproduce this?
@nkemnitz bump
No, at least not reliably. It used to be https://github.com/ZettaAI/zetta_utils/blob/nkem/zfish-enc/specs/nico/inference/zfish/0_encoding_zfish/1_Zfish_prepare_aced.cue#L79-L80 with the above bounding box.
But subchunkable has significantly changed since then with expand_bbox_processing
, expand_bbox_backend
and expand_bbox_resolution
. I tried replacing expand_bbox
with expand_bbox_processing
and it does complain about unaligned processing chunk sizes. Whether that means the bug is fixed, or expand_bbox_processing
is not a 1:1 replacement, I don't know.
BBOX: {
}
Poor alignment happens at 64nm, which is the first stage that does not use
shrink_processing_chunk
. Maybe because using the 128nm field as input causes a weird offset change?Issue is avoided by keeping
shrink_processing_chunk=False
for all resolutions.