Closed sandreas closed 2 weeks ago
Fixed by 63190a440cc0d892fe0d6bb48a94027b874d0387
Release should be up soon. I still have some general housekeeping to do here and there.
I still have some general housekeeping to do here and there.
A few days ago I started an approach to implement my long suggested approach to an AdvancedTrack
- if you are NOT interested in PRs, it would be great if you tell me beforehand :-)
I noticed, that you use a WinForms
-Project to test the UI integration. This did not work on Linux. Did you look into MAUI
or AvaloniaUI
?
Another thing I was missing was the nullable
project setting (expecially T?
), but this was not as important.
I hope I can support the project by submitting some code soon :-)
In case you want to keep track: https://github.com/Zeugma440/atldotnet/compare/main...sandreas:atldotnet:feature_map_field
A few days ago I started an approach to implement my long suggested approach to an AdvancedTrack - if you are NOT interested in PRs, it would be great if you tell me beforehand :-)
It's perfectly fine as long as you keep up with the latest commits (= no merging required on my side).
I noticed, that you use a WinForms-Project to test the UI integration. This did not work on Linux. Did you look into MAUI or AvaloniaUI?
I just needed a proof of concept to highlight how async
/ await
are essential on UI-based apps. You can safely ignore that project when building / testing on Linux.
Another thing I was missing was the nullable project setting (expecially T?), but this was not as important.
I'll probably be switching to that for the next major version. I've been coding a lot with Kotlin lately and have grown accustomed to working with the nullable syntax 😄
I hope I can support the project by submitting some code soon :-) In case you want to keep track: https://github.com/Zeugma440/atldotnet/compare/main...sandreas:atldotnet:feature_map_field
Cheers!
The fix for the issue you reported has been delivered in today's v6.08
Please close the issue if it works on your side~
Works as expected. Thank you very much.
A
tone
user found out, that theNext track ID
is invalid after importing chapters in anm4b
file, reference issue is: https://github.com/sandreas/tone/issues/51After tagging you can check the file via:
I reproduced this with the original atldotnet 6.7.0
Track
class with the code below. Sample files can be downloaded from (you won't need thetxt
file, the code sample includes the chapters as json):https://mega.nz/file/UiAVnKyK#A8AvSDr_k8u5LsBljLy4UmFcOCZ7-kh02LUTlLd3o-s