search

Zhangjinso / PISE

123 stars 28 forks source link

About the accurate correspondences between different parsing labels and indexes in your provided parsing data #20

Closed happyday521 closed 3 years ago

happyday521 commented 3 years ago

Hi! Could you tell me the accurate correspondences between different parsing labels and indexes in your provided parsing data? The parsing labels mentioned in your paper are 'Hair', 'Upper Clothes', 'Dress', 'Pants', 'Face', 'Upper skin', 'leg' and 'background', which seems differs from that in your provided parsing data. For example, in your provided parsing data, you set the 'Shoes' to a separate category，meanwhile combine the arm and leg skins into the same category. image

Besides, when I visualize your provided parsing data, the area of region with index == 1 seems always equal to 0. Please check it. PS: I don't solve my problem from the similar issue like #2

Thanks!

Zhangjinso commented 3 years ago

Hi. After checking the organization of the data, the correspondences are ['0': background, '1': hat, '2': hair, '3':upper clothes, '4': lower part of the body, '5': lower part of the body, '6': skin, '7' face]. This will be corrected in the next version of our paper. BTW, how to re-organize the labels to the limited categories of parsing (for efficiency) is worth discussing. The pose can help distinguish the legs and the arms, so I think it may be more reasonable. Therefore, in my opinion, if the labels are reasonable, you can re-organize it as you like to deal with.

happyday521 commented 3 years ago

Thanks for your reply. However, to be more precise, I think '4' should be 'Shoes(including socks)', while '5' should be 'lower clothes(e.g. pants, shorts)'. Regarding them all as 'lower part of the body' may be not reasonable. image

Zhangjinso commented 3 years ago

Yeap, 4 is represented as shoes (and socks). It is a typo error in the previous reply.