Closed Mathilda88 closed 5 months ago
Hi, it is strange to get this kind of outputs. Could you give more information about your procedures for this output? Like the platform you used and the outputs after running...
Thanks for your response. Actually, I'm on Fedora Linux, I tried different types of GPUs on a cluster, RTX8000 and V100 but the results are quite the same, with an old_size (256,256) and all the default setting of parameters. Additionally, I'm using the following packages:
python=3.6, pytorch=1.2, cudatoolkit=10.0 torchvision, anaconda 0.0.1.1 bleach 1.5.0 block-extractor-cuda 0.0.0 certifi 2021.5.30 cffi 1.14.6 cycler 0.10.0 dataclasses 0.8 decorator 4.4.2 dominate 2.6.0 html5lib 0.9999999 imageio 2.9.0 importlib-metadata 3.4.0 kiwisolver 1.3.1 local-attn-reshape-cuda 0.0.0 matplotlib 3.3.4 mkl-fft 1.3.0 mkl-random 1.1.1 mkl-service 2.3.0 natsort 7.1.1 networkx 2.5.1 numpy 1.19.2 olefile 0.46 opencv-python 4.5.3.56 pandas 1.1.5 Pillow 8.3.1 pip 21.0.1 pycparser 2.20 pyparsing 2.4.7 python-dateutil 2.8.2 pytz 2021.1 PyWavelets 1.1.1 resample2d-cuda 0.0.0 scikit-image 0.17.2 scipy 1.5.4 setuptools 58.0.4 six 1.16.0 tensorflow-tensorboard 0.4.0 tifffile 2020.9.3 torch 1.2.0 torchvision 0.4.0a0 tqdm 4.62.2 typing-extensions 3.10.0.0 wheel 0.36.2 zipp 3.4.1
Here are some examples:
Hi, I just test the current code with the checkpoints (with titan x on ubuntu), and the results are ok. I have never been seen this kind of result before. Sorry
Thanks for your response. May you keep the topic open to get the chance of leveraging from other experiences.
Hello, I would like to ask that whether the FID Scores is tested by the test_result you provided ?
Yes. The fid is computed as 256X256 between the generated images and the training images using this.
Hello,
Thanks for sharing the great work. I'm trying to generate the samples using the pretrained model. But unfortunately my results are so dim, something like this: Mine: Previously available by the authors:
Any help is greatly appreciated by the entire community.