Closed dzhunkoffski closed 3 months ago
Sure. But as I mentioned in README, I've been recently re-training my model on only a single A100-40G card. And training in HRSOD actually costs the most computation, since there are many settings and more images. It's still in training. But I just got the final results in the setting of using DUTS (D) as the only training set. Well-trained weights and predicted maps are being updated in google-drive, you can download them in 10 mins. And results are even better than the previous ones, which I will update in the next version of our paper:
+----------+-----------+----------+-------+--------+------+-------+--------+-----------+-------+-------+------+
& Dataset & Method & Smeasure & maxFm & meanEm & MAE & maxEm & meanFm & wFmeasure & adpEm & adpFm & HCE &
+----------+-----------+----------+-------+--------+------+-------+--------+-----------+-------+-------+------+
& DAVIS-S & tm--ep110 & .965 & .964 & .983 & .008 & .992 & .937 & .937 & .975 & .905 & .000 &
& DUT-OMRON & tm--ep110 & .870 & .820 & .884 & .043 & .892 & .806 & .797 & .884 & .795 & .000 &
& TE-DUTS & tm--ep110 & .938 & .932 & .956 & .020 & .965 & .912 & .910 & .937 & .871 & .000 &
& TE-HRSOD & tm--ep110 & .956 & .956 & .973 & .014 & .982 & .936 & .929 & .963 & .911 & .000 &
& TE-UHRSD & tm--ep110 & .932 & .935 & .946 & .028 & .954 & .921 & .906 & .925 & .890 & .000 &
+----------+-----------+----------+-------+--------+------+-------+--------+-----------+-------+-------+------+
thank you very much
Hello, thank you for your work, can not find pretrained weights for Sailent Object Detection, the gdrive contains only checkpoints for DIS and COD. Could you please provide well-trained weights on HRSOD too.