ZhouHengYi / quicksynergy

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/quicksynergy
0 stars 0 forks source link

Quicksynergy will not connect between two Ubuntu 10.4 machines #23

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.I set server to share with hostname of client.
2.I set client to use from local ip of server.
3.I click "execute" on server and then client, also have tried the reverse 
order.

I have followed instructional guides to setting up exactly.  It's not 
complicated.  However, there are no results.  It simply does not work.  I 
assume I am missing something but nothing I have found points toward any 
answer. 

I am using Quicksynergy 0.9.0 on two Ubuntu 10.4 machines. Also, one Windows 7 
machine.

The machines are all connected to one router.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by HobbitSa...@gmail.com on 5 Feb 2011 at 1:24

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I have a similar problem.  Using QuickSynergy 0.9.0 with two Ubuntu 10.10 
machines, I can connect just fine (according to the log), but I can't switch 
screens.

Original comment by joealanb...@gmail.com on 14 Feb 2011 at 5:43

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
same problem here, i have two machines (10.04 & 10.10) which ping each other 
(no firewalls) but quicksynergy (0.9-1) just don't work

Original comment by metalex....@gmail.com on 24 Mar 2011 at 7:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I have two 10.10 machines. It is working for me. I am using quicksynergy 0.9.0.

Original comment by techiemi...@gmail.com on 10 Apr 2011 at 5:16

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I have two machines using ubuntu 11.04. quick synergy is installed I am 
following the step by step guide filling the correct IP address or name, have 
un-installed and re-installed and still no luck. Maybe it is a "workspace" 
issue? Any ideas would be helpful. Thanks. 

Original comment by BertoMig...@gmail.com on 21 May 2011 at 1:46

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I have a similar issue on two ubuntu 11.04 machines. When I first installed the 
newest beta version I got some error, so I went with the most recent supported 
version. Strangely I can set my old computer as the server and my new one as 
the client, but I obviously want it the other way around with my new computer 
as the server. 

Original comment by nimajne...@gmail.com on 9 Jun 2011 at 5:02

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Hey nimajne, this seems to be a dead issues for any solutions so far; I have 
been searching for any kind of suggestion or solution and can't find anything, 
I did find ome ideas from about 3 years ago but not current and didn't solve 
the problem. So that is when I started asking in forums but up until now there 
have been no replies, nothing. So, I am wondering, is the question or problem 
so simple that I should be able to figure it out,or am I looking in the wrong 
forums or asking the wrong question(s)? Don't know. Hopefully someone that 
knows something will come up with a suggestion. Sure hope so.

Original comment by BertoMig...@gmail.com on 17 Jun 2011 at 6:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Bump- I'm having same problem. Just installed QuickSynergy on Ubuntu Lucid 
(10.4) and, having followed the user guide, I find that when I Execute on both 
machines, they behave as usual-- no mouse sharing.

Original comment by alex.pal...@gmail.com on 10 Sep 2012 at 12:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Okay I asked back in May 2011, now I am using 12.04 and still would like to 
connect using quicksynergy....I wonder is this so basic or simple or what? 
Seems it is still an issue for some. Thanks. 

Original comment by BertoMig...@gmail.com on 14 Sep 2012 at 6:00

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
A year or so ago, I spent a lot of time trying to get two 10.04 machines to 
connect and/or one 10.04 and one XP. No luck. Gave up, but in the process I 
think that I determined that it is a port issue. Not understanding that sort of 
think, I could take it no further.

Does that trigger an "aha!" with anyone who might understand port assignments, 
or whatever the correct term is?

Original comment by bluesmu...@gmail.com on 15 Sep 2012 at 11:40