codecov[bot]
commented
4 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 97.88%. Comparing base (
f2f7d90) to head (5db7f97). Report is 1 commits behind head on master.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #458 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 97.88% 97.88% ======================================= Files 87 87 Lines 10084 10085 +1 Branches 670 670 ======================================= + Hits 9871 9872 +1 Misses 213 213 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ZigRazor/CXXGraph/pull/458/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ZigRazor) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ZigRazor/CXXGraph/pull/458/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ZigRazor) | `97.88% <ø> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ZigRazor#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Just a small PR. I noticed that some of the new Graph methods didn't have any description, unlike the other methods for that class, so I wrote them.