Zuehlke / machines-code-people

Open Source Book about practicaly proven concepts, best practices, cultural philosophies and great ideas that we use in our daily work in projects at Zühlke
Other
37 stars 41 forks source link

Marketing: Find a title #14

Open abeggchr opened 7 years ago

abeggchr commented 7 years ago

propose titles as comments you can use "97" as the number of articles, although it will be changed to the actual number

abeggchr commented 7 years ago

97 pearls of wisdom

The book "97 things every programmer should know" describes itself as containting "97 pearls of wisdom".

abeggchr commented 7 years ago

97 pearls for wisdom from Zuhlke

bruderol commented 7 years ago

I think we should come up with something more unique to Zühlke, not just copy-paste the original idea from the "97 things every programmer should know" - and since the number of articles will not be fixed but should vary over time, i not recommend to take the number into the title.

Some ideas:

damphyr commented 7 years ago

WisdomZ: Things we learned @Zuehlke

abeggchr commented 7 years ago

CondenZed: Condensed knowledge from 50 years of Zuehlke

bruderol commented 7 years ago

I like the "from more than 50 years of Zuehlke" as a sub title - and either CondenZed, WisdomZ or ExperienZEs or something similar as the main title.

bruderol commented 7 years ago

ExperienZE: Experience the Experiences of Zühlke Engineering (=ZE) ;-)

tknerr commented 7 years ago

Do we want the explicit Zuehlke branding in the title?

Just asking.

If it's meant for Zuehlke employees only as the audience that fits perfectly.

If we want it as a book for everyone (because the experiences therein are generally applicable and work other people's context too) I would prefer a more neutral title -- otherwise people might get dragged a away because they think "only works for Zuehlke"

Or to put it the other way around: I would not read a "Best of Accenture Knowledge and Experience Condensed" book even if the content was great, just because of the title. Might be a personal thing. And accenture might not be the best example ;)

It should just be a deliberate decision whether we want that or not

bruderol commented 7 years ago

agree with @tknerr - maybe a more neutral title would be better - we can still put the zuehlke logo somewhere and Zühlke is already given by the fact that it is hosted and publshed on our zuehlke github account

abeggchr commented 7 years ago

Agree with @tknerr: including Zuehlke in the title should be a deliberate decision. I'd prefer a title without a prominent Zuehlke in its name. In the subtitle (which might not be printed on the cover) it is okay for me.

abeggchr commented 7 years ago

Do partially not agree with @bruderol: I think a creative title can include the number of articles. For a printed version the number is fix (i.e. the pilot edition uses 6, the first edition something higher) and for a digital edition, it can change daily (i.e. on a nightly build).

abeggchr commented 7 years ago

From Zuehlke With Love

As a subtitle, referencing James Bond "From Russia with Love", a movie which is - damn it - 5 years older than Zuehlke.

abeggchr commented 7 years ago

97 candies

Inspired by the movie "candy" which is on place 32 of the "Most Popular Feature Films Released 1968-01-01 to 1968-12-31" in imdb (see http://www.imdb.com/search/title?sort=moviemeter,asc&title_type=feature&year=1968,1968)

I do also like "Chitty chitty bang bang" from that list. No idea for a title though.

abeggchr commented 7 years ago

50'000 feet away from "Hello World"

bruderol commented 7 years ago

@abeggchr I propose to discuss that personal once. I hope to see you on Thursday.

peitor commented 7 years ago

From the grill event session:

peitor commented 7 years ago

"Empowering ideas"

abeggchr commented 7 years ago

move to: 50 shades of Zühlke as current working title

-> 50 is not the number of articles but:

bruderol commented 6 years ago

@abeggchr typo - you mean 50 shades not 5 shades - we have to hurry up for the jubilee :see_no_evil:

bruderol commented 6 years ago

@abeggchr should we then migrate the repo? to what repo name?

remember: the URL for publsihing with github pages will be: http://zuehlke.github.io/{repo-name} (this is not configurable, that is why the repo name is important)

bruderol commented 6 years ago

I think http://zuehlke.github.io/shades would be cool - other oppinions?

susanengel-z commented 6 years ago

"A 50-year lesson in innovation and agility" or "Lessons from 50 years of innovation and agility' - just to show we were agile and innovative before it was 'in' :D

sernst-zch commented 6 years ago

@susanengel-z 👍 ... or "Agile before it was cool" as main heading and "97 ?learnings? after half a decade of experience"

sernst-zch commented 6 years ago

or simply. "How to Zühlke" as main and "Best practice from the inside of an engineering company existing since 50 years"

abeggchr commented 6 years ago

So, we are looking for a new title. A title that captures the vision and sells it to potential readers.

And an additional aspect came up: it would be great to find a claim which serves as a "red line" throughout the book and to which all articles can connect to. A first idea in this direction is "Facets of Digitalization"

The discussion is open - for title and claim!

abeggchr commented 6 years ago

"This Is How We Do It" "How Zuehlke ticks" "How we tick"

abeggchr commented 6 years ago

Had a very good session with Markus where we came up with the idea of structuring the articles related to "solutions": The technical solution, the shiny solution, the validated solution ....

This is one option for structuring and then the title/claim would be related to "solutions"

sjanisch commented 6 years ago

"The DNA of the Zühlke Group"

masizuehlke commented 6 years ago

Thinking out loud.

Collection of thoughts, ideas, practices and wisdoms crafted in pot of our experiences in Zuhlke. Summing all years of experience of people who will contribute, that would be a centuries. All together - priceless. Generous & selfish act,

So...what about tile - "Gift"? Of same root, difference perspective - "Out of experience"

adiherzog commented 6 years ago

Wisdom is not a countable noun. So wisdoms does not exist and therefore I don't like WisdomZ either.