Closed ricqosu closed 4 months ago
Looks correct.
While improving a docstring's contents, it'd be great to simultaneously also fix issues with its formatting, see PEP 257.
Looks fine. We can review and close minor PRs.
@kishcs That's kind of a weird thing to say to an admin as a random user. The no. of mystery reviews on this non-essential PR by unrelated 3rd parties makes this increasingly look like an excercise to me. It's def. reminiscent of Hacktoberfest a few years back, when people put quantity of contributions over quality.
We can review and close minor PRs.
We can also learn from suggestions on how to improve the quality of our contributions, especially when that requires very little effort.
Definitely. I was just telling to reduce the PR count and to narrow down the focus on real issues and PRs. In case it's no quality, you can reject it too. 🙏
The chronology of actions taken on this PR and OP not showing interest in improving their submission is fascinating, in any case. Guess I wasn't too far off with what I said last.
Fixed typo in doc string