Closed a-r-j closed 2 months ago
SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.
0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells
No Coverage information
64.1% Duplication
Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint
SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.
1 Bug
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells
No Coverage information
28.0% Duplication
Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint
SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.
0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
1 Code Smell
No Coverage information
25.5% Duplication
Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint
SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.
0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells
No Coverage information
21.5% Duplication
Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint
Failed conditions
1 Security Hotspot
13.7% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 5%)
Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues
Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes
Uses
cpdb
to parse PDB files for improved performanceWhat testing did you do to verify the changes in this PR?
Added + modified tests.
Pull Request Checklist
./CHANGELOG.md
file (if applicable)./graphein/tests/*
directories (if applicable)./notebooks/
(if applicable)python -m py.test tests/
and make sure that all unit tests pass (for small modifications, it might be sufficient to only run the specific test file, e.g.,python -m py.test tests/protein/test_graphs.py
)black .
andisort .