Open ucakmakci opened 7 years ago
Hello, this discovery logic is intentional and was introduced in 1d2aa5c44051cfcb214939f3b64ad8cde74f1e7c As you have noticed the guest name includes node name as well, which leads to duplicate zabbix host entries - one is active and other becomes passive. But without this logic, when a Hyper-V migration occurs, zabbix host entry for this guest becomes passive and this guest cannot be discovered anymore, which we don't want. There might be a better way to deal with migrations and discovery logic. I may look into that in future, but can't promise I'll do ;) If you got any suggestions, please do share.
Perhaps remove no longer detected guests after X hours/days? (Can autodiscover remove hosts?)
Hello, I have received ownership of this repository. Is this issue still valid, and if yes, do you have a solution for it, or more analysis?
If no answer is received by end of march 2024 I will close this issue
Hello, can you hold off a bit, I'm testing your monitoring template in the meantime?
Hello,
I'm using your Hyper-V template script and it works nice. Thanks for this. On the other hand, I have a problem with hyper-v server with cluster structure. When a virtual machine moved-migrated to another hyper-v node on it create an another Host on Hyperv VM hostgroup.
For example This list of the host group on first HyperV Node; VirtualMachineABC_Node1
The list of the host group when moved-migrated to another node; VirtualMachineABC_Node1 (This one stays and values became passive ) VirtualMachineABC_Node2 (Creates another host for older VM)
I hope i could explain.
Thanks anyway.