a-smiggle / ruuvitag_fw_zephyr

Ruuvitag FW using Zephyr OS
MIT License
10 stars 5 forks source link

Update index.rst #32

Closed alueger closed 2 years ago

alueger commented 2 years ago

i2c pins P0.4 & P0.5 ruvvitag_hw Rev B8 https://github.com/ruuvi/ruuvitag_hw/blob/master/ruuvitag_revb8/ruuvitag_revb8_schematic.pdf

theBASTI0N commented 2 years ago

Hey Thanks for the PR. I will have a look at it shortly.

Have you confirmed the accuracy of the data?

Are you getting the same readings compared to a tag running the stock Ruuvi FW? (I do not have a newer Ruuvitag so am not able to compare)

alueger commented 2 years ago

I confirmed the accuracy but i am programming an new driver for the tmp117 , using the subroutines from the original

https://github.com/ruuvi/ruuvi.drivers.c/tree/be604c5f87ee362899ac4fa646bfd64d95823ab7/src/interfaces/environmental

i like to use the software features of the TMP117 - (Software reset, Software Sleep, oversampling …..)

see my git

https://github.com/alueger/ruuvitag_fw_zephyr

Andreas

Gesendet von Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 für Windows

Von: B@@.> Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. Oktober 2021 11:44 An: @.> Cc: @.>; @.> Betreff: Re: [theBASTI0N/ruuvitag_fw_zephyr] Update index.rst (PR #32)

Hey Thanks for the PR. I will have a look at it shortly.

Have you confirmed the accuracy of the data?

Are you getting the same readings compared to a tag running the stock Ruuvi FW? (I do not have a newer Ruuvitag so am not able to compare)

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/theBASTI0N/ruuvitag_fw_zephyr/pull/32#issuecomment-950293208, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACYC63ZLVOKIH6WUPUWTDW3UIPIODANCNFSM5GQPT2NQ.

theBASTI0N commented 2 years ago

Hey,

Are you wanting to use the TMP_ALERT pin?

Why is the power pin being toggled between reads? Should this only be toggled during init to reset the sensor?

Do you want Software reset, Software Sleep to be callable within the main application?

theBASTI0N commented 2 years ago

Not needed.