Open yaoxingzhi opened 2 years ago
My results are almost the same with you when finishing running test.py
. Then if you want to visualize the result, you can try tensorboard --logdir runs
, and check the local host printed in the terminal hints. For example, mine is as below. The visualization result is at http://localhost:6006/.
(randlanet-pytorch) root@ubuntu:~/f/RandLA-Net-pytorch# tensorboard --logdir runs
TensorFlow installation not found - running with reduced feature set.
W1116 09:06:26.744739 140686038304576 server_ingester.py:187] Failed to communicate with data server at localhost:40801: <_InactiveRpcError of RPC that terminated with:
status = StatusCode.DEADLINE_EXCEEDED
details = "Deadline Exceeded"
debug_error_string = "UNKNOWN:Deadline Exceeded {created_time:"2022-11-16T09:06:26.743382497+08:00", grpc_status:4}"
>
Serving TensorBoard on localhost; to expose to the network, use a proxy or pass --bind_all
TensorBoard 2.11.0 at http://localhost:6006/ (Press CTRL+C to quit)
My results are almost the same with you when finishing running
test.py
. Then if you want to visualize the result, you can trytensorboard --logdir runs
, and check the local host printed in the terminal hints. For example, mine is as below. The visualization result is at http://localhost:6006/.(randlanet-pytorch) root@ubuntu:~/f/RandLA-Net-pytorch# tensorboard --logdir runs TensorFlow installation not found - running with reduced feature set. W1116 09:06:26.744739 140686038304576 server_ingester.py:187] Failed to communicate with data server at localhost:40801: <_InactiveRpcError of RPC that terminated with: status = StatusCode.DEADLINE_EXCEEDED details = "Deadline Exceeded" debug_error_string = "UNKNOWN:Deadline Exceeded {created_time:"2022-11-16T09:06:26.743382497+08:00", grpc_status:4}" > Serving TensorBoard on localhost; to expose to the network, use a proxy or pass --bind_all TensorBoard 2.11.0 at http://localhost:6006/ (Press CTRL+C to quit)
Thank you for your reply, but I'm afraid my problem is not like what you said. What I want to visualize is the point cloud map after the semantic segmentation,I can visulize the result on tensorboard.
maybe you can check the test.py above,the two inputs' dimensions are not correct
maybe you can check the test.py above,the two inputs' dimensions are not correct
Thanks for the suggestion. Have you succeeded in implementing RandLA-Net-pytorch's work?
i occured this question too, whats MiniDijon8.ply meaning?
Hi, the problem is in the line where write_ply happens. It tries to write the predictions with tensor size[1,40960] along with cloud with tensor size [40960,3] and there is a mismatching in the second dimension of both. You can just expand your predictions by reshaping it : expanded_predictions = predictions.reshape(-1,1) also do not forget to send the clouds to cpu as well in order to avoid converting the cuda device tensor to numpy : cloud = points.squeeze(0).cpu().numpy()[:, :3]
hope this works for you
Hi, the test.py seems to only display partial results of point clouds, and the coordinates of the point cloud are different from the original point cloud.
thank you for your contribution! I have some questions about test.py, while I running this python file,the result is so weird as the following.
Loading data... 5_hallway_1_KDTree.pkl 6.2 MB loaded in 0.2s 5_hallway_15_KDTree.pkl 2.4 MB loaded in 0.0s 5_WC_2_KDTree.pkl 1.2 MB loaded in 0.0s 5_conferenceRoom_2_KDTree.pkl 3.7 MB loaded in 0.0s 5_conferenceRoom_1_KDTree.pkl 1.9 MB loaded in 0.0s 5_WC_1_KDTree.pkl 1.3 MB loaded in 0.0s 5_hallway_14_KDTree.pkl 1.4 MB loaded in 0.0s 5_hallway_12_KDTree.pkl 1.4 MB loaded in 0.0s 5_hallway_13_KDTree.pkl 2.4 MB loaded in 0.0s 5_hallway_11_KDTree.pkl 1.5 MB loaded in 0.0s 5_hallway_5_KDTree.pkl 5.1 MB loaded in 0.0s 5_conferenceRoom_3_KDTree.pkl 2.8 MB loaded in 0.0s 5_hallway_3_KDTree.pkl 2.3 MB loaded in 0.0s 5_hallway_10_KDTree.pkl 2.2 MB loaded in 0.0s 5_hallway_4_KDTree.pkl 1.9 MB loaded in 0.0s 5_hallway_2_KDTree.pkl 8.2 MB loaded in 0.0s
Preparing reprojected indices for testing Size of training : 16 Size of validation : 0 Loading model... Predicting labels... Accuracy: 0.22160644829273224 Writing results... Assigning labels to the point cloud... wrong field dimensions Done. Time elapsed: 2.2s
And I can not visualize the result about S3DIS task, could you please help me ?