Week 9 Review

[Adi-K-Coding]

Grading by Leah: 3/3 for everyone, notes, quizzes, and everything is there

Contributor	GitHub	Video Link	Avg Score
Aadit Gupta	@aaditgupta21	Video Link	Score: 5.75
Adi Khandelwal	@Adi-K-Coding	Video Link	Score: 5.75
Rohit De	@rohitd3	Video Link	Score: 5.75
Rohan Gaikwad	@rohang326	Video Link	Score: 5.75

[rohitd3]

Link to Rohit's video

Critique for group:

Adi - Positives:

• Your explanation and understanding of the Binary material by CB is proven to be thorough by your demonstration. You cited CB as well. You also showed that you were able to do this and explain it well.
• Your code walk-through for iteration and selection was well done. You show that you have an understanding of the code.
• I liked how you discuss what you need to improve and fix and also detail how you would need to improve your site.

Improvement:

• Show more of the runtime as well next time, but other than that it looked nice! I think you could have also connected to CB a bit more for iteration, for that I have -0.25

Score: 5.75/6 Nice job!

Aadit - Positives:

• I like the authentication feature a lot, you talked about this during our presentation last week and delivered well.
• Run time for your topics was well covered. I liked how you demonstrated your usage of github.
• You explained the API well, showing good understanding of the code. Improvement:
• You showed the run time and code well, however you should have explained more on how it ties to the CB material. -0.25. Score: 5.75/6 Nice!

Rohan - Positives:

• You were thorough with your 3 topics
• Your effort in your work is shown well
• Nice run through of the code

Improvement:

• Spend a bit more going through the code and not only runtime.-0.25

Score 5.75/6 Awesome effort!

[Adi-K-Coding]

Link to Adi's Video: https://www.loom.com/share/07876c681be04c6a8541d992d6db58c7 Critique for group:

Rohit- Positives: -I like how in-depth you went in your explanations of the input/out, binary, and boolean expressions. I also think that your in-depth explanations show your understanding of the code and what you programmed. -Your connection of the PBL to the CBL was excellent as you showed how the two related to one another and referenced specifically what section(1.2) in CB inputs and outputs were referenced in. -Your part where you showed the code that allows for overflow was a good touch because its important to recognize that sometimes a number that is larger than what can be stored is given, and we need to figure out what to do with it.

Improvement: I think for the first part of the video you, should have shown a little bit of the code behind the colors game just to show the code and explain a little behind it. For that reason, I gave a -0.25. Score: 5.75/6

Aadit - Positives:

-I think that the way that you implemented firebase to add in emails and passwords to create logins showed a very high understanding of the code -I think that it was good how much code and behind the scenes, you showed, and how much runtime you showed. The balance between the two was good as it helped us gain a better understanding of the topic. -For the API, I think your code and explanation of a lazy programmer was good because it showed how iteration is helpful in coding and makes things overall more efficient. Improvement: I think you could have shown a little more connection to college board topics, but your code was still very in-depth and showed a lot of understanding. For that reason, I gave -0.25. Score: 5.75/6

Rohan - Positives: -Your explanation of collaboration and scrum board showed how we all work together as a team, which was a really big part of college board and how they want us to work together -I can see that you put in a lot of effort into making sure that this week you tried to do a lot more coding, and also worked a lot on making the website look better with the wireframes and other aspects of the homepage. -Your work with the dictionaries was in-depth and showed understanding of how they work and how we can use them and implement them into our project(especially the math section)

Improvement: I think it would have been a little better to show a little bit more code so we could understand what was going on behind the scenes, but other than that it was good. For that I took off -0.25 Score: 5.75/6

[RohanG326]

Rohan's video Critique for group:

Rohit- Positives:

-Good citation to Collegeboard weeks -Liked the connection to the mini-labs to the color codes -Great explanation for each topic!

Improvement: -Show a little bit more of the backend code in the beginning Score: 5.75/6

Aadit - Positives: -Gave good background for each topic -Complex coding done for firebase -Interactive and shows change throughout the project

Improvements: -connect to collegeboard a little more Score: 5.75/6

Adi- Positives:

-I like how you showed specifically how everything connects to Collegeboard -I like how you also implemented the runtime along with the code -Looks like he spent a lot more time working the specifics of the code and the effort was definitely there

Improvement: -Add a little more coding for iteration Score: 5.75/6 Good work!

[rohitd3]

Contributor	GitHub	Video Link	Avg Score
Aadit Gupta	@aaditgupta21	Video Link	Score: 5.75
Adi Khandelwal	@Adi-K-Coding	Video Link	Score: 5.75
Rohit De	@rohitd3	Video Link	Score: 5.75
Rohan Gaikwad	@rohang326	Video Link	Score: 5.75

[aaditgupta21]

Aadits Video

Critique for group:

Adi

• I like how you connected your video with collegeboard topics with specific photos
• I liked how you explained iteration and your idea with new toys page with categories
• I liked how you talked about your future plans and what you want to add

Improvements

• Try to add more PBL tangibles Score: 5.75/6.00

Rohit

• Great job talking about the collegeboard topics
• Your explanations were very in depth with your project
• I liked your idea for utilizing our color code minilab with our project

Improvements

• I think you should have showed more of the code of the guessing color game in the beginning of the video Score: 5.75/6.00

Rohan

• Great run through and explanation of code
• Went very in depth in your three topics
• I liked how you wireframed first and then started to code. That is a number one thing a designer should do which you showed

Improvements

• Try to work on more aspects of the project next time and less on homepage. Score: 5.75/6.00