Closed ritvij14 closed 3 years ago
Please review the feedback. Please confirm if you are a GSSOC participant.
@awhitford yes I am a GSSOC participant. Do I have to send a screenshot of my selection email?
@awhitford yes I am a GSSOC participant. Do I have to send a screenshot of my selection email?
Great. I just want to ensure that we track this for GSSOC21 so that you can get your points. I'm not 100% sure what we need beyond a level designation, and I'm waiting on the documentation/guide for that (should be later today).
Merging #203 (39d10c3) into master (8dc81cd) will increase coverage by
0.03%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #203 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 95.05% 95.09% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 9 9
Lines 425 428 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 404 407 +3
Misses 21 21
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
lib/src/fade.dart | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8dc81cd...39d10c3. Read the comment docs.
@awhitford I have made all the modifications you ask, please have a look.
@aagarwal1012 & team: Do you have any testing requirements for a change like this? (The lines are being covered, but there is not a new, unique test case for adjusting these new parameters. Does there need to be?)
@aagarwal1012 It looks like both stable
and beta
builds are required. Is that on purpose? (I thought only stable
should be required now.)
It looks like both stable and beta builds are required. Is that on purpose? (I thought only stable should be required now.)
@awhitford, many flutter developers use the beta
channel, which's why I made the beta
build mandatory to pass.
@aagarwal1012 & team: Do you have any testing requirements for a change like this? (The lines are being covered, but there is not a new, unique test case for adjusting these new parameters. Does there need to be?)
Yes, I agree with you -- we should add parameter specific tests, we can create a separate GitHub issue for the same.
@allcontributors add @ritvij14 for code.
@aagarwal1012
I've put up a pull request to add @ritvij14! :tada:
Pull Request Process
Issues:
Fixes #190
Description:
fadeInEnd
andfadeOutStart
fields as optional fields forFadeAnimatedTextKit
fadeInEnd
is lesser thanfadeOutStart