JanosRenAI
commented
1 month ago Overall, your paper appears to be incomplete at this stage.
Strong Positive Points: You have renamed the Rproj file, making your work more identifiable. The LLM section has been updated, which indicates progress toward completing the paper. Critical Improvements Needed: It is important to update the paper with more content as soon as possible to receive more valuable feedback from peers. Suggestions for Improvement: Aside from renaming the Rproj file and updating the title, the majority of the paper seems unfinished. More sections need to be completed for a thorough review. Please consider the following: Update your datasets. Expand your literature review. Provide additional LLM details, sketches, and conclusions in the paper. Remove the redundant README.html file since you already have a README.md file. Evaluation: By incorporating better examples and detailed dataset analysis, the overall quality and score of the paper will likely improve. Focus on completing and refining the content. Estimated Mark: 10 out of 100. Reason: The paper is not complete and requires significant updates.
Opening statement summary
Overall your paper don't seem to be finished.
Strong positive points
I see you have changed the Rproj name and I can tell what you're trying to do in your paper. LLM part is updated as well.
Critical improvements needed
It would be better to see some work updated as soon as possible to get stronger feedbacks from peers.
Suggestions for improvement:
Other than the rpoj name and the title, the paper does not seem to be finished. It should be updated!
Please consider adding/changing/removing:
Update your datasets, literature, llm, sketches, and paper. Try to delete README.html since README.md exists.
Evaluation:
If you update your paper with good examples and dataset analysis, the overall mark will increase. Just need some updates.
Estimated mark:
10 out of 100.
Reason:
Paper is not finished and need updates.