Open amongonz opened 2 years ago
Will the deprecation of this be reversed? For the above use cases I don't see a clear alternative. If this has already been un-deprecated and my dream version is out of date then my mistake :)
We use Dream.path
in two cases:
.../build/latest/**
where it redirects to .../build/:build/**
preserving the tail of the pathfile/**
which looks up in a database to find the data corresponding to that file, somewhat similar to Dream.static
except with a indirection through a database.Thank you all. It looks like it's best to undeprecate it, but probably also consider routing in more detail.
The function
Dream.path
has been marked as deprecated. I understand that structured routing is preferable, but its removal blocks use cases for which routes can't be computed upfront. For example:Dream.static
depends on the internal equivalent topath
to map paths to the file system; it should be possible to implement such a handler with Dream's public API as well.path
to forward paths to CGI scripts.If
path
were removed, implementing such handlers would become an exercise in recursive application ofDream.router
to consume the entire path that wouldn't even provide any static information to parent scopes. Simple access to the path feels to me too foundational to remove, even if it competes with structured routes. (Would access to query parameters be removed as well if they were made routable?)If widespread access to
path
is problematic for routing, maybepath
could return a value only when the innermost route handler ends with a wildcard, and raise an exception otherwise. This would make handlers likestatic
or my CGI handler fail unless mounted directly under a wildcard, which I think is reasonable.