Closed aaronpeikert closed 4 years ago
Now ready for merge.
Very nice! Two things:
A solution to both problems would be to choose a different line type/color/width for the dependency arrows.
maybe long-dashes as line type for dependencies?
Otherwise, it's great.
one more thing: if we stay with renaming as suggested earlier, "clean.R" should become "process.R" and dependency should include "manuscript.Rmd".
one more thing: if we stay with renaming as suggested earlier, "clean.R" should become "process.R" and dependency should include "manuscript.Rmd".
@cjvanlissa uses the name prepare_data.R
I like process more (because it is more generic) but I am in a mental pat, you have to decide...
Very nice! Two things:
- the arrows for time (left-hand side across git versions) is the same as the dependency arrow. Let's make them distinct
- The dependency arrow is percetually very similar to the git version frames. Can we make them stand out a little more?
A solution to both problems would be to choose a different line type/color/width for the dependency arrows.
I overlooked the dashed line advice for make dependencies, now it looks like: https://github.com/aaronpeikert/reproducible-research/tree/2f5632515619d850c503314ae4fce98362cc53e7
I think clean, process, and prepare are all fine - but for readability I'd add a noun, like "_data".
It's also important to consider that the clean_data file might not be the entry point to the project for secondary analyses, so I also add a run_me.R or simply the Rmd as primary entry point.
I think clean, process, and prepare are all fine - but for readability I'd add a noun, like "_data".
I agree.
@brandmaier your call: clean_data
, preprocess_data
or prepare_data
?
great work, @aaronpeikert! Let's stay as close as possible to worcs, so prepare_data it is.
closes #26