Open brettz9 opened 8 years ago
isn't that what PR #152 is about?
That PR is increasing the situations (i.e., to Server.count
and Server.get
) where our existing range selectors can be used, but the pouchdb-find has additional selectors so just making a feature request for considering those selectors.
These look like they could come in handy: https://github.com/nolanlawson/pouchdb-find