Closed ranchodeluxe closed 10 years ago
this is a good safe test:
[{
"type": "Feature",
"properties": {"party": "Republican"},
"geometry": {
"type": "Polygon",
"coordinates": [[
[-104.05, 48.99],
[-97.22, 48.98],
[-96.58, 45.94],
[-104.03, 45.94],
[-104.05, 48.99]
]]
}
}, {
"type": "Feature",
"properties": {"party": "Democrat"},
"geometry": {
"type": "Polygon",
"coordinates": [[
[-109.05, 41.00],
[-102.06, 40.99],
[-102.03, 36.99],
[-109.04, 36.99],
[-109.05, 41.00]
]]
}
}]
Overview
:
hmm, sorry, given former issue #5, this now seems like a lot more work than previously thought.
Action Plan
:
1) we will need to convert the L.GeoJson ( or maybe just features) into something digestable by L.FeatureGroup
2) we also have to check projection types and throw errors if not WGS84 or Spherical Mercator
Conclusion
:
keep the styling, the lightbox and hooks -- remove the call to do anything with the geojson
create a textrea. add geojson. let me see a bbox. what happens if the projection is wrong? who cares, make it look snappy