Closed lacan closed 1 year ago
I agree it is a bit slow for larger images.
I've tried a few images but I cannot reproduce this undecipherable output. What type of image are you using? What are the image dimensions?
Dear @KevinNamink,
Thanks for looking into it. It is a lif file with 2048x2048x231 z slices
https://drive.switch.ch/index.php/s/Wip2HmXnHoxppg2 Password is hrm and the link will expire on friday.
Best Oli
Thanks for the file. I can now reproduce it. I've found and fixed the issue. The cause was in Huygens. In Huygens 23.10 this particular issue will be fixed.
I've also found a bug with the "legacy" SNR estimation mode. That should also work again with Huygens 23.10. This might be a faster method if that is important.
I think these problems are specific to Huygens 23.04, I'll try to put these fixes in a patch for that version as well. (I cannot 100% guarantee this patch will come.)
Describe the bug Due to how long the SNR estimator runs now, we had stopped using it. I tried it with a single channel dataset and have much trouble interpreting what it written... It just says Original 3 times and no links to help are displayed
To Reproduce Request an SNR estimation from a single channel image. I do not know the behaviour for multichannel images as of this writing
Expected behavior The classic Estimated SNR value, a lowest estimation and a highest estimation. Or something like on the documentation here https://svi.nl/HuygensRemoteManagerHelpSnrEstimator
Screenshots
Client-side FireFox 118.0.1 (64-bit)